'So inhumane and shameful': Oakland tenants displaced by apartment fire shocked after their leases are suddenly terminated. What renters need to know

According to tenants, this letter offered no clear timeline for repairs or assurances about their right to return once the building is fixed.

A neighbor by the name of Wenzel, who lives across the street, told CBS News that the whole situation is “so inhumane and shameful, I don't even have words for it.” John Gulino, one of the displaced residents (2), said he wasn’t sure about the legality of this recent notice and that he’s “not ready to sign anything until I talk with a lawyer.”

The building’s landlord, Ted Dang, declined to provide an in-depth explanation for his actions. Dang only claimed that if he didn’t terminate the leases, residents would have to keep paying rent while the building remained uninhabitable.

However, tenant advocacy groups and city officials aren’t buying Dang’s explanation.

What ‘red-tagged’ actually means under city and state law

When city building inspectors issue a red tag, they’re making a formal declaration that a structure isn’t safe for occupancy or entry. The issue with the case in Oakland is whether this designation gives a property owner the right to terminate leases.

According to a few legal experts — like David Hall from Centro Legal De La Raza, as well as the Oakland City Attorney’s Office — a red tag is not a legal delete button for a lease. While a red tag prevents a tenant from physically staying in the building, it does not dissolve the underlying legal relationship between the landlord and the tenant.

"This is not a sufficient notice to terminate their tenancy," Hall shared with CBS News (1). "They are still tenants there. The landlord is still required to make repairs, and when the landlord does finish the repairs and brings the building up to code and it's habitable again, the tenants have to be offered the tenant's first right of return."

Under Oakland law, as long as the residency hasn’t been totally destroyed, a red tag isn’t enough to give landlords a “just cause” to terminate the tenants’ contracts (3). In the case of the Oakland fire, city officials argue that because the building is repairable, the landlord can’t claim just cause for terminating these leases.

Oakland tenant law protects residents with the “right to return,” meaning the landlord must offer residents the opportunity to move back into their original unit at the same rent once it’s brought back up to code (4).

California’s Disaster Legal Assistance Collaborative also states that in cases where local authorities issue a red tag, “a tenant does not have to pay rent while the property is not habitable,” which contradicts Dang’s argument for canceling these leases (5).

​Oakland also offers many additional protections for tenants displaced by code violations or fire-related damage, including relocation payments and assistance with temporary housing (6). With all of these policies in place, critics claim Dang’s recent move wasn’t just unethical, it violates many rights that tenants have under state and local law.

Standing your ground when forced to move out

While the Oakland case was indeed an emergency situation, that doesn’t mean the renters suddenly lose their rights. In fact, it’s exactly the opposite for many cases.