The proposal to tax unrealized capital gains of the wealthiest Americans has sparked significant debate since President Joe Biden included it in his administration's fiscal 2025 budget.
Democratic presidential candidate Kamala Harris, who expressed her support for Biden’s tax plans generally, is now at the center of discussions about this potential novel hike.
While the idea of taxing unrealized capital gains has garnered attention from both proponents and critics, "Shark Tank" investor Mark Cuban is skeptical about its implementation.
“Every conversation I’ve had is that it’s not going to happen,” Cuban stated during a recent interview with CNBC. He said that he frequently communicates with Harris's team and shared their explicit feedback: “Their verbatim words to me is, ‘That’s not where we want to go.’”
Nevertheless, the billionaire investor emphasized that he does not speak for Harris, acknowledging, “She makes the final decision.”
As an independent, Cuban has endorsed Harris for president, lauding her as "pro-business." He also noted that her team is "the most open" he has seen compared to past administrations.
Concerns over taxing unrealized capital gains
Capital gains refer to the increase in value of an asset over time. When an asset is sold, and the increase in value is converted into cash, these are called realized capital gains, which are generally taxable. Unrealized gains, in contrast, are increases in value that have not yet been realized through a sale and are not presently subject to taxes.
The proposed unrealized capital gains tax by the Biden administration targets a narrow segment of the U.S. population. The proposal states that it will apply to “taxpayers with wealth (that is, the difference obtained by subtracting liabilities from assets) greater than $100 million.” Thus, it won't directly impact the majority of Americans.
Despite its limited scope, the proposal has stirred concerns, particularly regarding its complexity and feasibility of implementation.
One critical issue is market volatility. Asset values can significantly fluctuate, raising questions about the fairness and practicality of taxing these values based on a snapshot in time. For instance, one expert questioned whether, if a stock’s value rises one year and taxes are levied accordingly, but then the stock's value declines the next year, the taxpayer would receive a rebate.
Liquidity is another major concern. Owners of non-liquid assets like real estate might find themselves unable to pay taxes on unrealized gains without actually selling their assets, which could force untimely or undesirable sales.
Valuation could also be a challenge. Determining the accurate value of certain assets, particularly those not publicly traded, can be complex and subjective, leading to disputes and inconsistencies in tax assessments.
Must Read
- Dave Ramsey warns nearly 50% of Americans are making 1 big Social Security mistake — here’s what it is and the simple steps to fix it ASAP
- Robert Kiyosaki begs investors not to miss this ‘explosion’ — says this 1 asset will surge 400% in a year
- Vanguard reveals what could be coming for U.S. stocks, and it’s raising alarm bells for retirees. Here’s why and how to protect yourself
Join 250,000+ readers and get Moneywise’s best stories and exclusive interviews first — clear insights curated and delivered weekly. Subscribe now.
Harris’s vision
Cuban highlighted that there are differences between Harris's approach and Biden's proposals. He noted that while Harris respects the president's initiatives, she views them as a starting point rather than a definitive plan.
“She's trying to be very respectful of the president and everything he's proposed. She's trying not to directly contradict him in any way,” Cuban said.
A significant divergence in their approaches is evident in their proposed capital gains tax rate for high earners.
Harris has proposed a long-term capital gains tax rate of 28% for those earning $1 million or more, which contrasts with Biden's 39.6% rate suggested in his fiscal 2025 budget.
Cuban supports Harris's lower rate, commenting on its fairness: "When I talked to them, I thought it was fair," he remarked.
Emphasizing her commitment to supporting entrepreneurs, Harris proposed increasing the allowable tax deduction for startup expenses by tenfold, from $5,000 to $50,000.
Harris noted that it costs an average of about $40,000 to start a new business in America, which can be a “great financial barrier” holding entrepreneurs back.
“Not everyone has access to that kind of wealth and capital,” she stated. “So, part of my plan is we will expand the tax deduction for start-ups to $50,000. It’s essentially a tax cut for starting a small business.”
You May Also Like
- Turning 50 with $0 saved for retirement? Most people don’t realize they’re actually just entering their prime earning decade. Here are 6 ways to catch up fast
- This 20-year-old lotto winner refused $1M in cash and chose $1,000/week for life. Now she’s getting slammed for it. Which option would you pick?
- Warren Buffett used these 8 repeatable money rules to turn $9,800 into a $150B fortune. Start using them today to get rich (and stay rich)
- Here are 5 easy ways to own multiple properties like Bezos and Beyoncé. You can start with $10 (and no, you don’t have to manage a single thing)
Jing is an investment reporter for MoneyWise. He is an avid advocate of investing for passive income. Despite the ups and downs he’s been through with the markets, Jing believes that you can generate a steadily increasing income stream by investing in high quality companies.
