Former President Donald Trump stirred controversy with a bold proposal during a farming roundtable in Smithton, Pennsylvania.
He issued a stern warning to agricultural and construction equipment giant John Deere, threatening to impose a 200% tariff on any products manufactured in Mexico.
“I love the company, but as you know, they announced a few days ago that they're going to move a lot of their manufacturing business to Mexico. I'm just notifying John Deere right now. If you do that, we're putting a 200% tariff on everything that you want to sell into the United States,” he declared.
Thanks for subscribing!
The money news that actually matters.
By signing up, you accept Moneywise Terms of Use, Subscription Agreement, and Privacy Policy.
In June, Deere announced plans to relocate the production of skid steer loaders and compact track loaders from its Dubuque, Iowa, facility to Mexico by the end of 2026. The following month, the company announced layoffs.
Trump’s comments have sparked heated debate online, drawing reactions from high-profile figures.
Shark Tank investor Mark Cuban was quick to criticize Trump’s proposed tariff on Deere.
“This Lack of Understanding of Business is insane,” he posted on X. “Put a 200% tariff on the American company moving some production to Mexico. But tariff Chinese manufacturers 10 or 20%, so that the Chinese products will be cheaper to sell in the US than the American company. Good way to destroy a legendary American company and increase costs to American buyers.”
Cuban’s post resonated widely, garnering over 5.1 million views, 36,000 likes, and 6,200 comments. His remarks also caught the attention of real estate mogul Grant Cardone, who responded with an Instagram video titled “Economic Class for Mark Cuban on Tariffs.”
‘Pricing will be fair again’
Cardone didn't hold back in his criticism of Cuban.
“Hey Mark, I used to think that you were trolling X, and now I realize you must be vying for some kind of position in the Kamala Harris administration,” Cardone remarked.
Cardone’s comment may not be entirely off-base. Cuban has publicly endorsed Harris for president and even expressed interest in joining her administration to lead the Securities and Exchange Commission. “I told her team, look, put my name in for the SEC. It needs to change,” he said in a recent interview with CNBC.
Cardone went on to dismantle Cuban’s argument against the tariff, stating, “Your idea that a tariff is inflationary and it should scare the American people — it's ridiculous.”
Using products made in China as an example, Cardone argued, “You put a 200% tax on any toy, for instance, coming out of China, and the American people will simply quit buying that toy, until at which point America will start manufacturing that car, that toy, the car, whatever it is, the parts, America will start manufacturing — because pricing will be fair again.”
He emphasized that supply and demand ultimately determine prices. Cardone believes that once domestic production ramps up, it will spark “tremendous innovation” in the U.S. economy. Despite higher labor costs in the U.S., he’s confident that Americans will still be able to produce goods more cheaply than China. He argued that Americans will find “smarter, faster, better ways to do things once the tariffs are in place.”
Cardone’s conclusion was clear: “This is not a tax on the American people; it’s a tax on China.”
Must Read
- Jeff Bezos backs a platform that lets anyone invest in rental homes for as little as $100 — 6 ways to build wealth like a landlord without actually being one
- The tax breaks in Trump's 'big beautiful bill' expire after 2028. Here are 4 moves to make before the window closes
A double-edged sword
Economists generally view tariffs as a double-edged sword. While they can protect domestic industries by making imported goods more expensive, they often come with unintended consequences. Higher tariffs may lead to increased costs for consumers, as companies pass on the added expenses. This can result in inflationary pressures and reduced purchasing power for households.
Peter Orazem, an economics professor at Iowa State University, highlighted this issue.
“Making parts more expensive for John Deere is not gonna help John Deere either and it probably would not help jobs in the United States. So, I think some of this isn’t perfectly well thought out,” he explained. Orazem noted that higher tariffs not only raise the cost of imported components but also inflate the price of the final product. “So the consumer loses and the company loses,” he added.
Tariffs can also trigger retaliatory measures from other countries, leading to trade wars that disrupt global supply chains and hinder economic growth.
Ian Sheldon, a professor and Andersons chair of agricultural marketing, trade and policy at Ohio State University, echoed these concerns.
“We have this integrated market in North America, and we're already in a trade dispute with Mexico over genetically modified corn. It seems counterproductive to me to potentially exacerbate trade relations with one of our large trading partners. It doesn't make any sense to me,” he told Business Insider.
You May Also Like
- Dave Ramsey warns nearly 50% of Americans are making 1 big Social Security mistake — here’s what it is and 3 simple steps to fix it ASAP
- A single line on your car insurance policy could be inflating your premium by up to 30% — here's what to change
Jing is an investment reporter for Moneywise. He is an avid advocate of investing for passive income. Despite the ups and downs he’s been through with the markets, Jing believes that you can generate a steadily increasing income stream by investing in high quality companies.
