• Discounts and special offers
  • Subscriber-only articles and interviews
  • Breaking news and trending topics

Already a subscriber?

By signing up, you accept Moneywise's Terms of Use, Subscription Agreement, and Privacy Policy.

Not interested ?

Retirement Planning
Group of people sitting listening to a speaker YuriArcursPeopleimages/Envato

‘Raise our taxes to save Social Security,’ say a whopping 85% of Americans — do you agree with the overwhelming majority?

Who would have thought a resounding majority of Americans would be on board with raising their taxes?

But a new National Academy of Social Insurance survey (NASI) has found that 85% of Americans want to ensure their Social Security benefits remain intact, “even if it means raising taxes.”

Advertisement

In these times of political turmoil, Americans are near-universally aligned on one thing: saving their Social Security — at any cost.

The survey found that a majority of Americans were on the same page about Social Security, regardless of their generation, income level, education level or even political leanings.

More than four in five (81%) of Americans who haven’t received benefits yet said Social Security will be an “important or very important” part of their monthly income when they retire, versus just 4% who said it wouldn’t be.

“This survey finds not only strong bipartisan support for the program itself but also overwhelming agreement that lawmakers should act to close the system’s financing gap by raising the revenues needed to keep it on strong footing for the long haul,” the NASI said in its report.

What’s going on with Social Security?

Without any sort of intervention, Social Security will have a funding shortfall as early as 2033, according to the 2024 trustees report. At that point, the revenue coming in to support Social Security would cover only 79% of scheduled benefits (revenue comes from worker and employer contributions, as well as income tax on benefits and interest on trust fund reserves). A shortfall would mean an across-the-board reduction in benefits.

Then there’s the newly formed Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), a task force aimed at curbing government waste helmed by billionaire Elon Musk. DOGE is tasked with cutting $2 trillion from the budget, though Newsweek reported that Musk has since backtracked on that, saying it’s the “best-case outcome” rather than a firm target.

He thinks DOGE has a “good shot” at cutting at least half that amount, which is still $1 trillion.

Advertisement

So far, DOGE has dismantled the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) and shuttered the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB).

The Medicaid reimbursement portals in all 50 states were also briefly down in late January, after a pause on grants, loans and other financial assistance programs. Many workers, advocates and lawmakers are worried the Social Security Administration (SSA) could be in DOGE’s sights.

In 2024, 21% of the federal budget — that’s equivalent to $1.5 trillion — was spent on Social Security, according to the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities. That includes providing monthly benefits to retired workers, surviving children and spouses as well as disabled workers and their dependents.

While Trump repeatedly promised during his campaign that he wouldn’t touch Social Security benefits, experts suggest it would be difficult for DOGE to cut $2 trillion (or even $1 trillion) from the budget without impacting Social Security.

Must Read

Join 250,000+ readers and get Moneywise’s best stories and exclusive interviews first — clear insights curated and delivered weekly. Subscribe now.

Potential solutions to reduce the funding gap

So what do Americans want instead? The NASI survey found that more than four in five (82%) of respondents would prefer a bipartisan roadmap that includes a “package” of changes to make up for the funding shortfall and improve the program.

Advertisement

For example, improvements they’d like to see include a caregiving credit and bridge benefit for older workers with jobs that take a toll on their physical well-being.

This preferred “package,” according to NASI, would also include:

  • Eliminating a payroll tax cap for earnings above $400,000 (the most popular of all policy options)
  • Gradually raising the payroll tax rate from 6.2% to 7.2% for employers and employees (also a highly popular option)
  • Reducing benefits for beneficiaries with higher incomes in retirement

According to NASI, close to four generations of Americans — making up 98% of the current U.S. population — “have never lived without Social Security as a bedrock of economic security.” And for more than nine decades, the program hasn’t missed a payment.

“Rather than see the gap closed by reducing benefits, Americans want to see Social Security secured through revenue increases,” NASI said in its report. “And they are willing to pay more to strengthen the program’s finances.”

These are some of the measures that, NASI says, would eliminate the budget shortfall without having to raise the retirement age. But the unknown factor here is what DOGE intends to do with the SSA.

After all, it could be hard to avoid cuts to Social Security to meet that $2 trillion goal. So it’s not surprising that many Americans remain worried about their Social Security benefits.

You May Also Like

Share this:
Vawn Himmelsbach Contributor

Vawn Himmelsbach is a veteran journalist who covers tech, business, finance and travel. Her work has been featured in publications such as The Globe and Mail, Toronto Star, National Post, CBC News, Yahoo Finance, MSN, CAA Magazine, Travelweek, Explore Magazine and Consumer Reports.

more from Vawn Himmelsbach

Explore the latest

Disclaimer

The content provided on Moneywise is information to help users become financially literate. It is neither investment, tax nor legal advice, is not intended to be relied upon as a forecast, research or investment advice, and is not a recommendation, offer or solicitation to buy or sell any securities, enter into any loan, mortgage or insurance agreements or to adopt any investment strategy. Tax, investment and all other decisions should be made, as appropriate, only with guidance from a qualified professional. We make no representation or warranty of any kind, either express or implied, with respect to the data provided, the timeliness thereof, the results to be obtained by the use thereof or any other matter. Advertisers are not responsible for the content of this site, including any editorials or reviews that may appear on this site. For complete and current information on any advertiser product, please visit their website.

†Terms and Conditions apply.