Pennsylvania's Golden Girls law would let unrelated adults live together, but other states don't want to be be a pal or a confidant to single renters

With the rising cost of living, it’s easy to see why retirees on fixed incomes would be keen to share expenses — utilities and home insurance have spiked across the country, and property taxes and HOA fees have climbed for many Americans as well.

Pennsylvania’s Golden bill

While the characters in The Golden Girls — four mature women, three of whom aren’t related — famously lived together in one house, Rep. Tarik Khan wrote in the bill’s co-sponsorship memo that the same scenario wouldn’t be legal in Pennsylvania.

The characters “chose to share a home to save money and support one another like family,“ Khan wrote. “With housing costs rising so quickly today, sharing space like that is more important than ever.”

According to Khan, the state is short 265,000 affordable housing units. The bill seeks to eliminate “arbitrary limits on unrelated roommates,” and Khan writes that occupancy limits “drive up housing demand and prevent friends, workers, older adults and families from saving money by sharing a place.”

The House passed the bill on June 8, and will now head to the state Senate for consideration.

But while Pennsylvania may be moving toward allowing this kind of living arrangement, other states are pushing back.

Connecticut house speaker says residents would be ‘unhappy’ with students renting

Connecticut was on its way to passing a similar bill of its own, also referred to as the “Golden Girls bill,” which would have meant that homeowners could rent individual rooms to long-term tenants.

But, according to the CT Mirror, although the bill passed through the Senate, the House of Representatives never heard the bill, reportedly due to opposition from House Speaker Matt Ritter, the report said.

Ritter had concerns about college students renting out rooms in a wealthy neighborhood in Hartford, the report says, referencing emails from a lobbyist to Ritter’s chief of staff.

“What if a neighbor is unhappy about four unrelated people who are 19 years old or 22 years old living in the house? The owner says it’s occupied, but nine months out of the year they’re in another state. I mean, the question really comes down — to me — about who enforces it, and how would you deal with a situation like that?” Ritter said in an interview with CT Mirror.

Pennsylvania’s Golden Girls bill, however, circumvented this issue. Before it passed, it was amended to give local governments the ability to limit occupancy if unrelated people are students at a college or university.

Other states that have passed their own “Golden Girls” laws include Iowa, Colorado and Oregon.

The social benefits of communal living

An op-ed in Governing argues that homelessness skyrocketed after regulation of single-room occupancy (SRO) units from the 1950s to the 1970s “decimated” the country’s stock of small, affordable, dorm-like apartments with shared amenities.

It added that allowing for living arrangements, Golden Girls-style, with friends could also let older adults reduce their expenses. And there’s an added bonus: It could also provide health benefits.