SPY +0.43%
BND -0.25%
QQQ +0.69%
DIA +0.16%
VNQ -1.39%
GLD -2.95%
BTC -1.18%
AAPL +2.06%
GOOGL +1.23%
NVDA +3.93%
MSFT +3.36%
META +0.38%
AMZN +2.26%
TSLA +0.69%
UBER +0.37%
GS -0.66%
BAC +0.12%
JPM +0.33%
BRK.A +0.14%
COST -1.11%
XOM -0.88%
BABA -1.00%
WMT -1.21%
SPCX +0.96%
DIS -1.41%
F -0.07%
  • Discounts and special offers
  • Subscriber-only articles and interviews
  • Breaking news and trending topics

Already a subscriber?

By signing up, you accept Moneywise's Terms of Use, Subscription Agreement, and Privacy Policy.

Not interested ?

Entertainment
Dolly Parton on the left, and Elvis Presley on the right. Terry Wyatt/WireImage, Michael Ochs Archives/Getty Images

Dolly Parton said no to Elvis — and it turned out to be the best money decision of her career

Advertisement

And while many people associate “I Will Always Love You” with Whitney Houston, whose 1992 cover of the song for the soundtrack to “The Bodyguard” became the best-selling single of all time by a woman in the U.S., it was indeed Parton who originally wrote and recorded the hit song.

Money advice that fits your real life.

By signing up, you accept Moneywise Terms of Use, Subscription Agreement, and Privacy Policy.

Houston’s success with the single ended up being a huge win for Parton’s career, but if she hadn’t said no to Elvis Presley first, it might not have worked out this way.

Turning down an offer from Elvis

About a year after Parton released the song in 1974, Presley contacted her saying he wanted to release his own version of “I Will Always Love You.” She was thrilled about the idea, given that she was a huge fan, until Presley’s manager called her the night before he was set to record the cover and said Elvis wouldn’t do it unless Parton handed over half of the songwriting rights.

Despite how sad she felt that Presley’s cover wouldn’t come to fruition, she was not willing to give up the rights. “I said, ‘I can’t do that’,” she told Howard Stern in a 2023 interview, adding “of course I cried all night about that.”

Must Read

Join 250,000+ readers and get Moneywise’s best stories and exclusive interviews first — clear insights curated and delivered weekly. Subscribe now.

The best money decision of her career

Despite the initial disappointment that an artist Parton idolized would not be covering her song, it ended up being a great decision for Parton’s finances.

When Houston’s version catapulted to the top of the charts in 1992, Parton started to make a hefty profit off the song. If she had accepted Presley’s offer, she would not have made as much as she did from the song down the line.

“I was so thankful I made that choice because I made a lot of money off of Whitney’s,” Parton told Stern. According to Forbes, Houston’s recording earned Parton $10 million in the 1990s alone.

But it wasn’t just money that Parton got out of it. The singer was so thrilled to hear her song take off in this new way: “I couldn’t even believe my little country sad song could even be done like that” she said.

Recalling her first time hearing Houston’s version, Parton told Stern she was driving home when the song came on the radio. She was so overwhelmed that she had to pull over, “that was one of the greatest experiences I’ve ever had in my entire life.”

You May Also Like

Share this:
Em Norton Content Specialist

Em Norton is a Content Specialist at moneywise.com. They have been with the company since 2022.

more from Em Norton

Explore the latest

Disclaimer

The content provided on Moneywise is information to help users become financially literate. It is neither investment, tax nor legal advice, is not intended to be relied upon as a forecast, research or investment advice, and is not a recommendation, offer or solicitation to buy or sell any securities, enter into any loan, mortgage or insurance agreements or to adopt any investment strategy. Tax, investment and all other decisions should be made, as appropriate, only with guidance from a qualified professional. We make no representation or warranty of any kind, either express or implied, with respect to the data provided, the timeliness thereof, the results to be obtained by the use thereof or any other matter. Advertisers are not responsible for the content of this site, including any editorials or reviews that may appear on this site. For complete and current information on any advertiser product, please visit their website.

†Terms and Conditions apply.