In an October interview with billionaire entrepreneur Mark Cuban, Shannon Sharpe shared his story of missing out on Google shares shortly after the tech giant’s initial public offering (IPO) in August 2004. In response, Cuban told Sharpe that he regrets not listening to his son and buying Nvidia stock a few years ago.
Sharpe claims he wanted to invest $300,000 in Google stock when it went public, but his financial advisers warned him against it because they considered it overpriced at $115 per share.
Thanks for subscribing!
Read the best of Moneywise in 5 minutes or less.
By signing up, you accept Moneywise Terms of Use, Subscription Agreement, and Privacy Policy.
“[Google is] worth over $3 trillion now,” Cuban laughed. “I would’ve been a billionaire with you,” said Sharpe.
But his estimates seem to be off. Adjusted for stock splits and the formation of a new holding company, Alphabet, investors in Google’s IPO are up 6,500% over the past 20 years. Sharpe’s $300,000 investment would now be worth nearly $20 million. Not bad, but a long way away from a billion.
Nevertheless, Sharpe and Cuban’s regrets over missing out on Google and Nvidia have a common theme: misleading valuations.
Valuations can be misleading
Value investors such as Warren Buffett focus on finding high-quality stocks that are mispriced. However, this style of investing is different from investors focused on hypergrowth.
Companies like Google and Nvidia dominated technological breakthroughs that allowed them to scale up rapidly. In other words, they could grow into their valuations over time as revenue and earnings expanded at an accelerated pace.
For instance, Google shares were trading at 65 times earnings shortly after the IPO. By traditional measures, that would be considered overpriced. However, Google’s earnings per share have expanded at a faster rate than the stock price over the past 20 years, which is why the stock now trades at a relatively modest price-to-earnings ratio of 24.70.
Similarly, Nvidia stock was trading at 247 times earnings per share in mid-2023, a ludicrously inflated valuation. However, the company’s revenue and earnings have skyrocketed since then, which has lowered the stock’s price-to-earnings ratio down to 53.48 this year.
Professional investors understand this and often don’t mind paying the price for relatively expensive stocks that are on the path toward robust growth. Here’s how you can adjust your valuations to account for growth.
Must Read
- The ultra-rich use these 5 real estate strategies to build wealth while they sleep — you can start with just $100
- Here’s the average income of Americans by age in 2026. Are you keeping up or falling behind?
- Insurance companies profit most from drivers who auto-renew without shopping around. Comparing 100+ quotes takes 2 minutes and costs nothing
Join 250,000+ readers and get Moneywise’s best stories and exclusive interviews first — clear insights curated and delivered weekly. Subscribe now.
Growth-adjusted valuation
Professional investors who are focused on hypergrowth companies use a price/earnings-to-growth (PEG) ratio. This is a modified version of the price-to-earnings ratio that accounts for how fast a company’s earnings are expected to grow.
To calculate the PEG ratio, simply divide the stock’s current P/E ratio by the company’s earnings growth rate for a set timeframe. If the ratio is below one, the stock is considered undervalued. Whereas, a PEG ratio greater than one is overvalued.
For example, if a stock is trading at a price-to-earnings ratio of 100 but you expect its earnings to grow by 100% in the upcoming year, the PEG ratio is 1 and the stock can still be considered fairly valued.
Similarly, Google’s current P/E ratio (as of Dec. 23) is 26.01 and if you believe the company can expand earnings by roughly 25% next year, you could consider it a fairly valued investment.
The value of these ratios hinge on the quality of your assumptions. So if your forecast of earnings growth is incorrect, the ratio could be misleading. However, when this valuation tool is used correctly and based on thorough due diligence, it can help you spot companies that are on the path to robust growth over the long-term.
You May Also Like
- JP Morgan sees gold hitting $6,000/oz before 2027 — and a Gold IRA lets you hold the physical metal while deferring the tax bill. Get your free guide from Priority Gold
- Dave Ramsey warns nearly 50% of Americans are making 1 big Social Security mistake — here’s what it is and the simple steps to fix it ASAP
- Thanks to Jeff Bezos, you can now become a landlord for as little as $100 — and no, you don't have to deal with tenants or fix freezers. Here's how
- Millionaires under 43 are reshaping investing — just 25% of their portfolios are in stocks. Here’s where their money is going
Vishesh Raisinghani is a financial journalist covering personal finance, investing and the global economy. He's also the founder of Sharpe Ascension Inc., a content marketing agency focused on investment firms. His work has appeared in Moneywise, Yahoo Finance!, Motley Fool, Seeking Alpha, Mergers & Acquisitions Magazine and Piggybank.
Managing Money • 17h ago
Are you richer than you think? 5 clear signs you’re doing better than the average American in 2026
Managing Money • Jun 11
