Aug 16, 2026
Follow us on Google for more Moneywise news
Add us on GoogleInvestors who bet on Bill Ackman’s acumen probably aren’t feeling all that enthused right now.
Since the Pershing Square founder released his closed-end fund “Pershing Square USA” (PSUS) in April, it hasn’t followed the broader market’s uptrend. Quite the contrary: The share price for Ackman’s fund has only gone down since its $5 billion opening.
Advertisement
Those IPO investors bought PSUS at $50 per share, but it has since trended downward and is now trading in the $40-range.
Thanks for subscribing!
Invest smarter with our free newsletter.
By signing up, you accept Moneywise Terms of Use, Subscription Agreement, and Privacy Policy.
By comparison, the S&P 500 is up nearly 14% year-to-date, while more tech-heavy indices like the NASDAQ-100 are doing even better.
But what really has Ackman annoyed is how cheap his fund’s shares are relative to their net-asset value (NAV).
As a closed-end fund, the price of Pershing Square USA doesn’t perfectly mirror the value of the shares Ackman holds like a mutual fund or ETF. Instead, this fund can trade at a discount or premium based on market sentiment. The NAV gives the most accurate estimate of this fund’s true value if you purely look at the assets it holds.
As of the time of writing, Pershing Square estimates the NAV per share on PSUS is $50.32. That’s roughly 20% higher than where PSUS is actually trading at the current market price. According to The Wall Street Journal, Ackman said this ultra-low rate is “frankly absurd.”
Moneywise emailed Pershing Square for further comment, but the firm only said, “At this point we’re not commenting beyond the published materials and the calls.”
What’s driving the discount for PSUS?
In Pershing Square’s semi-annual report, Ackman identified PSUS’s discount to NAV as the “biggest challenge since the IPO,” arguing that double-digit divergence is “one of the widest discounts of any U.S. closed-end fund invested in public securities.”
As for what Ackman sees as the root cause, he mentioned “technical factors from the IPO” and the company’s failure to market the fund effectively. As Ackman put it, “The composition of the portfolio up until this moment has been largely unknown, which has also made it difficult for many closed-end fund investors to buy the stock.”
However, the underperformance may also stem from Ackman’s investment preferences. In a more recent August 12 letter to shareholders, Ackman openly acknowledged that “semiconductors and tech hardware and equipment” have driven the S&P 500’s outperformance. Yet you won’t find names like Sandisk or Micron in Pershing Square’s portfolio as they don’t fit Ackman’s stated investment style.
Advertisement
Pershing Square’s website clearly spells out the companies Ackman is most interested in buying: “Free-cash-flow-generative, North American large capitalization growth companies at attractive valuations.” While this fits Ackman’s preferences and his belief in creating predictable, long-term value, it also means he’s missing outsized gains in more cyclical chipmakers.
Barron’s also pointed to another factor impacting Pershing Square USA’s underperformance: High fees.
The annual management fee on PSUS shares is about 2%, which is quite high compared with standard ETFs and mutual funds. For instance, Vanguard’s popular S&P 500 ETF (VOO) currently has an expense ratio of just 0.03%.
Investors need to believe a closed-end fund like PSUS will significantly outperform benchmark indexes to justify its pricey fees.
Advertisement
Must Read
- The ultra-rich use these 5 real estate strategies to build wealth while they sleep — you can start with just $100
- Here’s the average income of Americans by age in 2026. Are you keeping up or falling behind?
- Insurance companies profit most from drivers who auto-renew without shopping around. Comparing 100+ quotes takes 2 minutes and costs nothing
Join 250,000+ readers and get Moneywise’s best stories and exclusive interviews first — clear insights curated and delivered weekly. Subscribe now.
Can Ackman close the NAV gap?
Moving forward, there will likely be more Pershing Square promos to try and entice retail investors and financial advisors into this fund. As Ackman told current investors, “We clearly need to do a better job of generating demand for our funds, which requires active marketing and you can help by spreading the word about PSUS.”
Beyond telling more people about PSUS’s cheap valuation and what it holds, Ackman is making big moves he believes will create long-term value.
In the past few months, Pershing Square bought six new companies for the Pershing Square USA fund. These include well-known names like payment processors Visa and Mastercard and the global streaming behemoth Netflix. Ackman also took stakes in the market infrastructure firms S&P Global and Intercontinental Exchange, as well as the eyecare company Alcon.
As for sales, Bloomberg noted that Ackman dumped a few holdings this year like Hertz and Universal Music.
And don’t think all the bad news about PSUS’s price has dampened Ackman’s ambitions for future funds. As The Wall Street Journal reported, Ackman is still working on a fund that helps investors break into venture capital.
You May Also Like
- JP Morgan sees gold hitting $6,000/oz before 2027 — and a Gold IRA lets you hold the physical metal while deferring the tax bill. Get your free guide from Priority Gold
- Dave Ramsey warns nearly 50% of Americans are making 1 big Social Security mistake — here’s what it is and the simple steps to fix it ASAP
- Thanks to Jeff Bezos, you can now become a landlord for as little as $100 — and no, you don't have to deal with tenants or fix freezers. Here's how
- Millionaires under 43 are reshaping investing — just 25% of their portfolios are in stocks. Here’s where their money is going
Eric Esposito is a freelance contributor on MoneyWise who loves making financial topics accessible and understandable to readers. In addition to MoneyWise, Eric’s work can be found in publications such as WallStreetZen and CoinDesk.
