Oct 22, 2024
Sure, Americans might not always see eye to eye on politics, but there’s one thing that just about everybody agrees on — money matters, especially when it comes to retirement.
A new report from the National Institute on Retirement Security shows that across party lines, nearly all Americans are worried about issues relating to their financial security in retirement.
Advertisement
In fact, 90% of Democrats, 88% of Independents and 86% of Republicans feel that Social Security must remain a priority. And when it comes to the cost of long-term care, the concern is pretty universal as well — 83% of Independents, 81% of Democrats and 80% of Republicans are worried.
Thanks for subscribing!
Read the best of Moneywise in 5 minutes or less.
By signing up, you accept Moneywise Terms of Use, Subscription Agreement, and Privacy Policy.
The reality is that no matter who ends up in office after November, these are the kinds of issues lawmakers can’t ignore for much longer.
While the consensus is clear, the path forward is looking a bit rocky. Let’s break down what’s going on and why our politicians need to act fast.
Social Security is in crisis
Social Security is facing a funding crisis as older Americans continue to retire and claim benefits. While younger workers are expected to replace them to some degree, declining birth rates have created a scenario where the number of retirees far exceeds the number of new workers.
This is a problem because Social Security gets most of its funding from payroll taxes. A shrinking workforce means less revenue. Combine that with an uptick in benefit claims from fresh retirees, and the program is heading for financial trouble in the years ahead.
Social Security does have trust funds it can tap into to keep benefits flowing for a while, but once those trust funds are emptied, benefit cuts could occur.
The latest Social Security Trustees Report estimates that the program's combined trust funds will run dry by 2035. At that point, seniors could see their monthly benefits reduced by about 25%.
Both Republican and Democratic lawmakers agree on supporting Social Security, but they have different strategies for preventing these cuts.
Advertisement
Democrats want to solve the funding shortfall by raising taxes on the wealthy. Republicans, on the other hand, are looking at raising the full retirement age to keep more money in the program. Right now, the full retirement age is 67 for workers born in 1960 or later.
Both approaches have their pros and cons. Raising taxes on the wealthy could lead to higher maximum Social Security benefits since payouts are tied to earnings, which might offset some of the extra revenue. On the flip side, raising the retirement age could force people to delay retirement and might lead to more cases of age discrimination in the workforce.
As incidents of ageism in the workplace increase, older workers run the risk of being forced out of jobs earlier than planned. In those cases, having to wait longer to collect full benefits is far from ideal.
Either way, lawmakers will have to put their heads together and prioritize Social Security soon. After all, 2035 isn’t that far off and slashing benefits could push millions of seniors into or near poverty.
Must Read
- The ultra-rich use these 5 real estate strategies to build wealth while they sleep — you can start with just $100
- Here’s the average income of Americans by age in 2026. Are you keeping up or falling behind?
- Insurance companies profit most from drivers who auto-renew without shopping around. Comparing 100+ quotes takes 2 minutes and costs nothing
Join 250,000+ readers and get Moneywise’s best stories and exclusive interviews first — clear insights curated and delivered weekly. Subscribe now.
Long-term care has become expensive
The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services estimates that 70% of adults aged 65 or older will need some type of long-term care in their lifetime. But for many seniors, those costs are unaffordable.
Advertisement
Here’s what long-term care costs looked like on average in 2023, according to Genworth:
- $75,504 for a full-time home health aide
- $64,200 for assisted living
- $104,025 for a shared nursing home room
- $116,800 for a private nursing home room
Unfortunately, there’s little help available to pay for long-term care. Medicare won’t cover it, and while Medicaid will, many seniors find themselves in a bind: they have just enough income to cover their bills, but not a low enough income to be eligible for Medicaid.
Even if Medicaid’s eligibility rules were loosened for long-term care, it still puts a burden on states to come up with the funding to pay for it. That’s a whole other can of worms.
Ideally, lawmakers will put their heads together to arrive at a plan for easing the burden of long-term care. That could include rolling out subsidies for qualifying families or finding ways to expand Medicare coverage to pick up the tab for certain services. But given that Medicare, like Social Security, is facing its own financial crisis, that’s not something to bank on anytime soon.
You May Also Like
- JP Morgan sees gold hitting $6,000/oz before 2027 — and a Gold IRA lets you hold the physical metal while deferring the tax bill. Get your free guide from Priority Gold
- Dave Ramsey warns nearly 50% of Americans are making 1 big Social Security mistake — here’s what it is and the simple steps to fix it ASAP
- Thanks to Jeff Bezos, you can now become a landlord for as little as $100 — and no, you don't have to deal with tenants or fix freezers. Here's how
- Millionaires under 43 are reshaping investing — just 25% of their portfolios are in stocks. Here’s where their money is going
Maurie Backman has been writing professionally for well over a decade. Since becoming a full-time writer, she's produced thousands of articles on topics ranging from Social Security to investing to real estate.
