• Discounts and special offers
  • Subscriber-only articles and interviews
  • Breaking news and trending topics

Already a subscriber?

By signing up, you accept Moneywise's Terms of Use, Subscription Agreement, and Privacy Policy.

Not interested ?

Top Stories
Kevin Warsh at The Semafor 2024 World Economy Summit on April 18, 2024 in Washington, DC. Photo by Tasos Katopodis/Getty Images for Semafor

Trump may pick the richest Fed chair in history: Kevin Warsh's $100+ million net worth dwarfs past chairs. Here's how they stacked up

Trump Federal Reserve chair nominee Kevin Warsh raised eyebrows with his recent financial disclosure report (1), offering a glimpse into a personal fortune that would make most former Fed chairs blush.

The disclosure from Warsh, who previously served as an executive director at Morgan Stanley, a Fed governor and an economic advisor to President George W. Bush, showed a net worth far exceeding $100 million, which some estimates could top out at close to $230 million (2).

Advertisement

That includes assets valued at $100 million in an LP called "Juggernaut Fund" and a $10 million advisory role for Duquesne Family Office, LLC, founded by billionaire Stanley Druckenmiller, among other earnings and investments.

A full accounting of Warsh's fortune is not available, as disclosures often only provide the possible scope of an asset's worth, as opposed to the exact amount (3). Other holdings are listed without valuations, with SpaceX and Polymarket among them (worth noting, SpaceX is targeting a potential IPO for summer 2026, which could inflate the value of these assets further).

Still, his estimated worth at present alone would make Warsh the richest Fed chair in modern history — an accounting that doesn't include his wife Jane Lauder, granddaughter of cosmetics titan Estée Lauder, who herself boasts a $1.9 billion net worth (4).

How Warsh's fortune compares to past Fed chairs

Warsh, if selected as Fed chair, would become the 17th person to hold that position since 1914 and the wealthiest in the modern era.

While financial breakdowns aren't available for most former Fed chairs, Marriner Eccles, a banker who controlled "one of the largest family fortunes in the Western United States" according to the New York Times (5), is likely the only one to give Warsh a run for his money. While his worth upon becoming Fed chair in 1934 is unknown, he began managing his family's $7 million fortune in 1912. That $7 million would amount to roughly $238 million today (6).

Alan Greenspan, who began the second-longest tenured run as Fed chair in 1987, had a reported net worth of between $4 million to $8 million (7), while his successor, Ben Bernanke, held a modest $2.3 million in what Forbes called a "plain vanilla portfolio (8)."

Janet Yellen, the first and only female Fed chair, came next, bringing a net worth between $4 million and $13 million, which included the value of her stamp collection (9).

Advertisement

And in 2017, when Jerome Powell replaced Yellen, his fortune — worth between roughly $20 million and $55 million — made him the wealthiest Fed chair in modern times (10) to this point.

Must Read

Join 250,000+ readers and get Moneywise’s best stories and exclusive interviews first — clear insights curated and delivered weekly. Subscribe now.

Ethics and Fed independence concerns around Warsh

Warsh's financial disclosure, however, raised eyebrows for reasons other than its tally.

Columbia Law School professor Kathryn Judge flagged that many of the details of Walsh's financials remained hidden due to pre-existing confidentiality agreements, telling Reuters that "when those disclosures leave questions unanswered, the Senate can ​and should use the hearings to get the information ⁠it needs to make that determination (11)."

Warsh, for his part, confirmed his intention to divest many assets if he becomes Fed chair (12) and a member of the Office of Government Ethics (OGE) noted on the financial disclosure that when he does so, "he will be in compliance (1)."

Moneywise reached out to the Federal Reserve Board of Governors for comment, but didn't receive a response by press deadline.

Warsh is set for an April 21 hearing with the Senate Banking Committee, but his succeeding Powell hinges on the conclusion of a controversial Justice Department investigation against the latter over renovation costs for the Federal Reserve building.

A federal judge shut down the pursuit of grand jury subpoenas for the case in March, declaring that their purpose is to "harass and pressure Powell either to yield to the president or to resign and make way for a Fed chair who will (13)."

Advertisement

Republican senator Thom Tillis, in opposition to the investigation, promised to block any Fed chair nomination until it wraps — which GOP Senator Tim Scott believes could happen in "the next several weeks (3)." Powell, for his part, said that he'll stay on as Fed chair beyond the May 15 expiration of his term if no successor is approved to replace him before then (14), prompting a threat from Trump to fire him if he tried to do so (15).

Still, many wonder about the future of the Fed's independence if Warsh, who served as a Fed governor from 2006-2011, takes the helm. The Washington Post noted that, after years of advocating for higher interest rates, Warsh recently called for lowering them under conditions that represent a view "more closely aligned with the president's public demands (16)."

And last year, Warsh criticised the "bad economic policies coming from the central bank," adding that, when it came to Trump's interest rate frustration with Powell, he had "some sympathy" for the president (17).

Experts, meanwhile, have long warned about threats to the Fed's independence and the potential for ripple effects across the wider economy.

Columbia Business School economics professor Brett House told CNBC that any "assault on the Fed's independence can only mean higher rates, greater volatility and uncertainty for consumers in the years ahead (18)."

Article Sources

We rely only on vetted sources and credible third-party reporting. For details, see our ethics and guidelines.

Office of Government Ethics (1),(12); CNBC (2),(18); The New York Times (3),(5),(7),(13),(14); Forbes (4),(8); In2013Dollars (6); Reuters (9),(11); The Washington Post (10),(16); BBC (15); Fox Business (17)

You May Also Like

Share this:
Mike Crisolago Staff Reporter

Mike Crisolago is a Staff Reporter at Moneywise with more than 15 years of experience in the journalism industry as a writer, editor, content strategist and podcast host. His work has appeared in various Canadian print and digital publications including Zoomer magazine, Quill & Quire and Canadian Family, among others. He’s also served as a mentor to students in Centennial College’s journalism program.

more from Mike Crisolago

Explore the latest

Disclaimer

The content provided on Moneywise is information to help users become financially literate. It is neither investment, tax nor legal advice, is not intended to be relied upon as a forecast, research or investment advice, and is not a recommendation, offer or solicitation to buy or sell any securities, enter into any loan, mortgage or insurance agreements or to adopt any investment strategy. Tax, investment and all other decisions should be made, as appropriate, only with guidance from a qualified professional. We make no representation or warranty of any kind, either express or implied, with respect to the data provided, the timeliness thereof, the results to be obtained by the use thereof or any other matter. Advertisers are not responsible for the content of this site, including any editorials or reviews that may appear on this site. For complete and current information on any advertiser product, please visit their website.

†Terms and Conditions apply.