SPY -0.81%
BND -0.06%
QQQ +0.20%
DIA -1.66%
VNQ -0.46%
GLD -1.96%
BTC -3.93%
AAPL -3.88%
GOOGL -1.18%
NVDA -1.10%
MSFT -3.63%
META +0.86%
AMZN -0.70%
TSLA -2.32%
UBER -3.22%
GS -0.20%
BAC -0.04%
JPM -1.80%
BRK.A -0.79%
COST -1.86%
XOM -1.52%
BABA -0.46%
WMT -2.17%
SPCX +1.92%
DIS -2.56%
F -1.77%
  • Discounts and special offers
  • Subscriber-only articles and interviews
  • Breaking news and trending topics

Already a subscriber?

By signing up, you accept Moneywise's Terms of Use, Subscription Agreement, and Privacy Policy.

Not interested ?

Top Stories
Sam Altman speaks during the G20 Innovation Ministerial in North Carolina. Matt Ramey/AFP via Getty Images

Sam Altman says ignoring AI is like saying ‘We’re not going to have electricity’ 100 years ago — it’s a ‘non-negotiable’

Advertisement

Speaking at the G20 Innovation Ministerial in Chapel Hill, North Carolina, Altman told attendees, “I think it would be approximately as bad of an idea to say we’re not going to have AI in our country as it was to say we’re not going to have electricity in our country, you know, back 100 plus years ago.”

The money news that actually matters.

By signing up, you accept Moneywise Terms of Use, Subscription Agreement, and Privacy Policy.

For Altman, adding artificial intelligence to a nation’s infrastructure today isn’t just a “nice-to-have” competitive advantage — it’s a requirement.

As Altman explained, “I think it is non-negotiable that you have to use it [AI],” adding that “the economic growth and benefit to people that can come from this, the value to a country, is too high to ignore.”

Other tech luminaries such as Meta’s CEO Mark Zuckerberg, Nvidia’s CEO Jensen Huang and SpaceX CEO Elon Musk also pumped up the prospects of AI at the recent G20 event. As The Wall Street Journal reported, a common thread in all these presentations was a call for sensible regulation that won’t stifle AI’s benefits. Or, as Huang put it, “Don’t regulate hypothetical, theoretical harm.”

To help shape this more favorable regulatory framework, countries at G20 adopted the “Carolina Principles,” which emphasize flexibility rather than harsh enforcement. Under these points, countries should use existing regulations and only create new AI-specific rules for “novel considerations that existing legal frameworks cannot adequately address.”

The Carolina Principles also encourage lots of funding for AI research, including “flexible regulatory sandboxes and experimental exemptions” for AI labs.

Cybersecurity: AI’s stumbling block?

Although most executives painted a pretty picture for AI’s potential, a few acknowledged legitimate potential dangers. According to the WSJ, Altman and Google DeepMind’s co-founder Demis Hassabis said AI could pose a significant cybersecurity threat if leaders aren’t careful.

As CNBC reported, Altman said, “I think some things are going to go very wrong with cybersecurity unless people act quite urgently.” If countries fail to put the right safeguards in place pronto, he argued it “could set this technology back a great deal.”

Altman’s comments come a few months after OpenAI made headlines for a security crisis where its agents hacked internal systems and the AI platform Hugging Face.

Advertisement

Speaking with PBS NewsHour, NYU Professor and AI Researcher Gary Marcus placed the blame solely on OpenAI’s lax security protocols. “OpenAI really screwed up here,” Marcus said, adding that “The monitoring was very weak on OpenAI’s part. It was not really industry standard for what we expect of cybersecurity.”

And OpenAI’s data breach wasn’t a one-off issue. Other companies like Anthropic and Meta announced similar unsanctioned attacks from their agents this year.

Moneywise reached out to OpenAI for further comment but didn’t hear back by the time of publication.

Must Read

Americans aren’t excited about AI

Another threat to AI’s ascendancy that many leaders brought up at G20 was the intense public resistance.

Advertisement

As AI tools become ubiquitous, it seems more people are turned off by this technology. For instance, Gallup’s data between 2025 and 2026 shows the percentage of Americans who think AI “does more harm than good” rose from 31% to 39%.

Earlier this year, Gallup discovered that data centers were one of the most hated aspects of the AI ecosystem, with seven in ten respondents saying they oppose these facilities in their communities. To address these concerns, G20 presenters spent most of their time arguing against what they viewed as misconceptions surrounding data centers.

As CNBC reported, Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick said data centers would bring “prosperity to those communities” and assured residents that “they’re going to bring down the cost of power in that community, and they’re going to bring, because they’re going to create tremendous tax revenue.”

Anthropic co-founder Tom Brown also tried to get people on board with data centers, citing President Trump’s recent positive posts on Truth Social. As Brown argued, “the data centers are just an enormous source of prosperity. They produce a ton of jobs. They reduce taxes.”

Despite these glowing comments, AI companies will probably need to do more PR work to change the popular perception. A more recent YouGov survey shows 51% of respondents still believe building data centers is a “bad thing for the country,” and another 63% say they’re ready to oppose one if they catch wind that it’s coming to their town.

You May Also Like

Share this:
Eric Esposito Freelance Contributor

Eric Esposito is a freelance contributor on MoneyWise who loves making financial topics accessible and understandable to readers. In addition to MoneyWise, Eric’s work can be found in publications such as WallStreetZen and CoinDesk.

more from Eric Esposito

Explore the latest

Disclaimer

The content provided on Moneywise is information to help users become financially literate. It is neither investment, tax nor legal advice, is not intended to be relied upon as a forecast, research or investment advice, and is not a recommendation, offer or solicitation to buy or sell any securities, enter into any loan, mortgage or insurance agreements or to adopt any investment strategy. Tax, investment and all other decisions should be made, as appropriate, only with guidance from a qualified professional. We make no representation or warranty of any kind, either express or implied, with respect to the data provided, the timeliness thereof, the results to be obtained by the use thereof or any other matter. Advertisers are not responsible for the content of this site, including any editorials or reviews that may appear on this site. For complete and current information on any advertiser product, please visit their website.

†Terms and Conditions apply.