• Discounts and special offers
  • Subscriber-only articles and interviews
  • Breaking news and trending topics

Already a subscriber?

By signing up, you accept Moneywise's Terms of Use, Subscription Agreement, and Privacy Policy.

Not interested ?

Entertainment
A split-panel photo of The Odyssey cast and Elon Musk gettyimages.com / Mike Coppola (left); Alex Wong (right)

Elon Musk says he'd be 'down' to give Mel Gibson $100M for an adaptation of 'The Odyssey' to counter Chris Nolan's 'woke' version

Christopher Nolan is a heavily decorated filmmaker, with 12 films and 49 Academy Award nominations under his belt. Elon Musk, who has never directed a movie, thinks he can do better.

Elon Musk has made it no secret that he doesn’t like Christopher Nolan’s new Odyssey adaptation.

Advertisement

“Chris Nolan desecrated the Odyssey so that he would be eligible for an Academy Award …” said Musk in a May 15 X post, over a month before the movie’s premiere.

Money advice that fits your real life.

By signing up, you accept Moneywise Terms of Use, Subscription Agreement, and Privacy Policy.

He’s likely referring to the idea that filmmakers need to meet cast diversity quotas to be eligible for an Oscar. The Academy does require that films meet certain diversity standards to qualify for a Best Picture award, but the standards are broad; films without any people of color in their cast, for example, are still able to qualify.

Now that Nolan’s film is out to rave reviews from both critics and audiences, Musk has taken to X once again to share his plans to make a more “historically accurate” version of the film.

“Before this year ends, Grok Imagine will make a full-length movie of The Odyssey that is historically accurate and true to the art of Homer,” said Musk in a July 21 X post.

That same day, he replied “I’m down” to a tweet asking him to give Mel Gibson $100 million to film a “painstakingly accurate” Odyssey adaptation.

Gibson might have been chosen for previously directing the historical epic Braveheart — and for having a number of famous controversies centered around the actor/director’s alleged antisemitism, racism and homophobia, making him an “anti-woke” pick.

But what does it mean for an Odyssey adaptation to be historically accurate? And is $100 million enough to make a film rivaling Nolan’s?

Musk calls for a “historically accurate” Odyssey. What does that even mean?

Nolan’s film has been under fire for being “woke” ever since it was announced that Lupita N’yongo was cast as Helen of Troy, a Greek figure known for her beauty. Other cast members, such as trans man Elliot Page, have also faced backlash for not being white or cisgender.

“Just saw The Odyssey… The movie is just as woke as you fear, if not more so,” said right-wing internet personality Matt Walsh, who identifies as a theocratic fascist in his X bio. “The DEI casting is atrocious.”

Advertisement

Musk has used the words “historically accurate” to refer to his version of The Odyssey, presumably in contrast to Nolan’s film. But is a historically accurate version of the mythic tale even possible?

“The whole controversy around the Nolan film has been a little head-scratching,” said Daniel Mendelsohn, a classicist with a published translation of The Odyssey, in an interview with The Times. “There is no such thing as a historically accurate version of The Odyssey.”

Mendelsohn says that The Odyssey is a hodgepodge of different eras from Greek history.

“The armor, the modes of fighting, the courtship rituals — it’s a mixed bag from all different periods of civilization, and so there is nothing to be historically accurate to,” he says.

Musk’s announcement of a Grok-driven Odyssey adaptation was itself a quote retweet to a three-minute Grok-generated scene of The Odyssey, which Mendelsohn said also contained historical inaccuracies.

Advertisement

“I do wish they would stop putting these guys in sleeves,” said Mendelsohn in the same interview. “The Greeks didn’t have sleeves. That was a sign that you were a foreigner.”

Musk’s call for historical accuracy, contextually, is more about Nolan’s casting choices than his costuming ones. But Musk’s focus on race isn’t reflective of how Greeks at the time saw the world.

Ancient Greeks did not understand race the same way modern Americans do, and even their words for color can be difficult to translate accurately. In an article for Aeon, AG Leventis Professor of Greek culture at the University of Cambridge Tim Whitmarsh says you could translate The Odyssey such that Odysseus has black skin and blue hair — although that likely wouldn’t be accurate to Homer’s intent.

“So to ask whether Achilles and Odysseus are white or black is at one level to misread Homer,” says Whitmarsh in the article. “His color terms aren’t designed to put people into racial categories, but to contribute to the characterization of the individuals. Greeks simply didn’t think of the world as starkly divided along racial lines into black and white.”

Must Read

Join 250,000+ readers and get Moneywise’s best stories and exclusive interviews first — clear insights curated and delivered weekly. Subscribe now.

$100 million is a healthy budget for a movie — but it’s less than half what Nolan spent

The X post Musk responded to called for a $100 million budget for a Gibson-led Odyssey adaptation. That’s a sizable budget — just enough to be considered blockbuster-worthy and well ahead of the industry average $64 million production budget.

Advertisement

It’s also well under Nolan’s Odyssey budget of $250 million.

If Musk is still planning on making the film with AI, $100 million is certainly enough. A feature-length, fully-AI generated film that recently premiered at the Marché du Film in Cannes reportedly cost only $500,000 to make. Hiring Gibson would certainly bring that price up, but not by $99.5 million.

If Gibson’s entrance into the project would mean Musk ditching AI, that makes things trickier. Braveheart cost $72 million to make — back in 1995. In 1995, the average production cost of a movie was $34.5 million, almost half of what it is today.

Using those numbers, Braveheart would cost around $133.6 million to make now.

Neither Musk’s nor Gibson’s representatives responded to a request for comment.

You May Also Like

Share this:
Kit Pulliam Freelance Writer

Kit Pulliam is a DC-based financial journalist with over five years of experience writing, editing, and fact-checking financial content.

more from Kit Pulliam

Explore the latest

Disclaimer

The content provided on Moneywise is information to help users become financially literate. It is neither investment, tax nor legal advice, is not intended to be relied upon as a forecast, research or investment advice, and is not a recommendation, offer or solicitation to buy or sell any securities, enter into any loan, mortgage or insurance agreements or to adopt any investment strategy. Tax, investment and all other decisions should be made, as appropriate, only with guidance from a qualified professional. We make no representation or warranty of any kind, either express or implied, with respect to the data provided, the timeliness thereof, the results to be obtained by the use thereof or any other matter. Advertisers are not responsible for the content of this site, including any editorials or reviews that may appear on this site. For complete and current information on any advertiser product, please visit their website.

†Terms and Conditions apply.