Crypto use more common in ‘underserved communities’
Just like with traditional assets, those who have more money are more likely to be investors, says Merav Ozair, a blockchain expert and FinTech professor at Rutgers Business School.
“I'm not surprised to hear that,” Ozair said after reviewing the Fed’s figures. “This is exactly in line with what I know about this ecosystem and the research that I'm doing."
Ozair explained that those who use crypto for investing are “basically looking for profit,” so they treat it like other asset classes, like stocks and futures.
Meanwhile, lower-income Americans are more likely to use cryptocurrencies for transactions and less likely to have a traditional bank account or credit card.
The report adds that almost one quarter of people with less than a high school degree and 20% of those with income less than $25,000 were "underbanked."
According to the Library of Congress, an “unbanked” person is someone who doesn’t have a checking or savings account with an FDIC-insured institution, while an "underbanked" person might have such an account but regularly relies on alternative financial services such as a check cashing company or payday lender.
Ozair says she's not surprised that those who use crypto as a payment method come from what she calls “underserved communities.”
She points to the Philippines, where about 71% of adults were unbanked in 2019, according to a survey by the Central Bank of the Philippines.
Ozair explains that with crypto adoption at nearly 80% in that country, these alternative currencies are helping fill the gap for those underbanked citizens.
Too ‘early’ to talk about socioeconomic impacts
Still, only about 3% of adults and 13% of those considered underbanked are currently using crypto to make purchases. So what’s stopping the underbanked in the U.S. from relying more on crypto to disrupt the system?
Ari Juels, professor at the Jacobs Technion-Cornell Institute at Cornell Tech, suggests we may be looking at the wrong metrics.
“I wouldn’t measure Google and Amazon’s disruption of the tech ecosystem mainly in terms of who is buying and profiting from Apple or Amazon stock,” Juels says. “I don’t think many people would.”
He argues that the success of blockchain technologies shouldn’t be measured based on who is profiting from it, but whether it’s benefiting society as a whole.
“The question is: ‘How useful are these technologies to communities of users and in what ways?’ If you ask that question, it’s clear that it’s early days for blockchain technologies,” he says.
Like Juels, Ozair believes that “we aren’t there yet” in terms of full societal transformation, despite seeing some progress in offering new opportunities for people who otherwise wouldn’t have access to traditional support from the financial industry.
Juels adds the term crypto itself “shows how extensive misunderstanding of the technology is,” adding that all the “hype” often drives “ill-advised investment.”
For him, the most exciting prospect isn’t cryptocurrency itself — it’s the “power and possibilities” of blockchain technology.
“People are tracking cryptocurrency price movements instead of focusing on the technology itself and its current pockets of real promise,” says Juels.
He sees vast potential in using crypto to help decentralize finance, but adds nobody really understands crypto enough to be able to “forecast with any accuracy” how the technology will change over the next five to 10 years.
Until then, Ozair suggests anyone interested in helping unlock crypto’s potential get involved at their local level with others who share their values and vision.
“Give the feedback to the developers to build it right,” says Ozair. “[On] how to make it useful, how to make it efficient, how to make it productive … and not just a product for a product[‘s sake].”
Fine art as an investment
Stocks can be volatile, cryptos make big swings to either side, and even gold is not immune to the market’s ups and downs.
That’s why if you are looking for the ultimate hedge, it could be worthwhile to check out a real, but overlooked asset: fine art.
Contemporary artwork has outperformed the S&P 500 by a commanding 174% over the past 25 years, according to the Citi Global Art Market chart.
And it’s becoming a popular way to diversify because it’s a real physical asset with little correlation to the stock market.
On a scale of -1 to +1, with 0 representing no link at all, Citi found the correlation between contemporary art and the S&P 500 was just 0.12 during the past 25 years.
Earlier this year, Bank of America investment chief Michael Harnett singled out artwork as a sharp way to outperform over the next decade — due largely to the asset’s track record as an inflation hedge.
Investing in art by the likes of Banksy and Andy Warhol used to be an option only for the ultrarich. But with a new investing platform, you can invest in iconic artworks just like Jeff Bezos and Bill Gates do.